15 Best Audio Interfaces for Streaming That Will Elevate Your Sound Quality in 2027

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 4th Gen is my best overall audio interface for streaming because its two inputs suit many solo and guest setups without the complexity of a full production console. For a simpler, one-mic setup, the Scarlett Solo 4th Gen is a strong alternative, while the RØDECaster Duo stands out for streamers who want built-in production controls. The main tradeoffs are input count, live control, and setup complexity: a basic interface keeps the signal path simple, while a mixer-style device can handle more sources and adjustments at the desk. Your microphone, guests, and routing needs matter as much as the recording specifications. Read on for the full comparison and guidance on which type fits your stream.

Before you orderOffer from Amazon

Get audio and creator gear delivered free with Prime

• Fast, free delivery on millions of items
• Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
• Member-only deals all year

Start your free Prime trial →Free trial for eligible customers · Cancel anytime

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.Hide

Complete the kit

12 Inch Black Zip Ties 2000 Pack Cable Ties 45 LBS

Add to your setup →

18 Inch Zip Ties Double Sided Toothed (500 Pack),100 LBS…

Add to your setup →

Cable Zip Ties,400 Pack Black Assorted Sizes 12+8+6+4 Inc…

Add to your setup →

Key Takeaways

• The Scarlett 2i2 4th Gen is the most flexible starting point in this lineup: two inputs give a solo streamer room to add a second mic or instrument without moving to a production console.
• The two Scarlett Solo generations serve different priorities: the 4th Gen is the newer pick, while the 3rd Gen remains a simpler option for a one-mic setup that does not need extra input capacity.
• The RØDECaster Duo and MAONO AME2 target hands-on production: they make more sense when you want mixer-style controls and multiple sources than when you only need a clean mic connection.
• Gaming mixers solve a different problem from traditional interfaces: the FIFINE Ampligame SC3 and MAONO G1 Neo prioritize desk-side control for gaming streams, rather than a minimal recording-focused setup.
• Phone and tablet support changes the shortlist: the MAONO P1 and P2 Hybrid are aimed at mixed-device workflows, while a conventional USB interface is often the more direct fit for a computer-only stream.

Our Top Audio Interface For Streaming Picks

Focusrite Scarlett Solo 3rd Gen USB-C Audio Interface		Best Overall for Solo Streamers	Connectivity: USB	Channels: 2	Maximum sample rate: 192 kHz	VIEW ON AMAZON	See Our Full Breakdown
Wrugste USB Audio Interface Solo 24Bit/192kHz with 48V Phantom Power for Recording, Podcasting, Streaming		Best for Broad Software and OS Compatibility	Connectivity: USB audio input; XLR connectivity listed	Channels: 2	Maximum sample rate: 96 kHz	VIEW ON AMAZON	See Our Full Breakdown
MAONO P1 USB Audio Interface with 70dB Gain for PC, Phone, iPad & Guitar		Best for Mobile and Cross-Device Streaming	Connectivity: USB	Channels: 2	Maximum sample rate: 192 kHz	VIEW ON AMAZON	See Our Full Breakdown
M-AUDIO M-Track Duo USB Audio Interface		Best for Two-Mic Starter Setups	Audio resolution: 48 kHz	Inputs: Two combo XLR/Line/Instrument inputs with phantom power	Outputs: Stereo ¼-inch main outputs; ¼-inch headphone output	VIEW ON AMAZON	See Our Full Breakdown
M-AUDIO M-Track Solo USB Audio Interface		Best Compact Starter Interface	Connectivity: USB Type-B	Channels: 2	Inputs: Balanced XLR mic, balanced ¼-inch line, unbalanced ¼-inch instrument	VIEW ON AMAZON	See Our Full Breakdown
RØDE RØDECaster Duo Compact Audio Production Studio, Black		Best All-in-One Streaming Studio	Channels: 4	Connectivity: USB	Output connectors: TRS, USB Type-C	VIEW ON AMAZON	See Our Full Breakdown
PIYONE 2X2 24-bit/192kHz USB C Audio Interface for High-Fidelity Recording, XLR/TRS Combo Inputs, Monitor Loopback, Alloy Red		Best for Simple Two-Input Streaming	Channels: 2	Audio input: XLR/TRS combo	Maximum sample rate: 192 kHz	VIEW ON AMAZON	See Our Full Breakdown
FIFINE Ampligame SC3 Gaming Audio Mixer with Indi-Fader and Volume Control		Best for Gaming Stream Controls	Channels: 4	Microphone input: XLR	Phantom power: 48 V	VIEW ON AMAZON	See Our Full Breakdown
MAONO G1 Neo Gaming Audio Mixer Audio Interface with XLR Input & 48V		Best for Phone-and-PC Streaming	Channels: 4	Connectivity: Auxiliary, Bluetooth, USB	Audio input: Microphone, Bluetooth, computer, smartphone	VIEW ON AMAZON	See Our Full Breakdown
MAONO PS22 Lite USB Audio Interface for PC, Guitar & Vocals Streaming		Best for Portable Recording and Streaming	Channels: 2	Connectivity: USB	Maximum sample rate: 192 kHz	VIEW ON AMAZON	See Our Full Breakdown
MAONO P2 Hybrid USB Audio Interface Dual XLR for PC, Phone, iPad, Guitar		Best for Multi-Device Streaming	Connectivity: USB	Channels: 2	Maximum sample rate: 192 kHz	VIEW ON AMAZON	See Our Full Breakdown
MAONO AME2 Audio Interface Mixer, Podcast Studio Console with XLR Input		Best for Podcast-Style Streams	Channels: 10	Connectivity: XLR, 3.5 mm TRRS, 6.35 mm, USB Type-C	Output connector: XLR	VIEW ON AMAZON	See Our Full Breakdown
Elgato Wave XLR MK.2 USB Audio Interface and DSP Mixer		Best for XLR Mic Processing	Connectivity: USB	Channels: 2	Audio input: XLR	VIEW ON AMAZON	See Our Full Breakdown
Focusrite Scarlett Solo 4th Gen USB-C Audio Interface		Best for Solo Streamers	Connectivity: USB	Channels: 2	Audio inputs: 1	VIEW ON AMAZON	See Our Full Breakdown
Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 4th Gen USB-C Audio Interface		Best for Two-Mic Streaming	Connectivity: USB	Channels: 2	Maximum sample rate: 192 kHz	VIEW ON AMAZON	See Our Full Breakdown

More Details on Our Top Picks

1. Focusrite Scarlett Solo 3rd Gen USB-C Audio Interface

   

   Best Overall for Solo Streamers

   View on Amazon

   The Scarlett Solo 3rd Gen is a strong fit for a streamer who needs one microphone and a guitar or other instrument, without adding a mixer’s extra controls. Its Air mode can add presence to a vocal, while the high-headroom instrument input helps keep guitar and bass signals clean. Compared with the M-Audio M-Track Solo, it supports a higher maximum sample rate and includes a software bundle, making it the more capable choice for a setup that may grow into music recording. The tradeoff is its two-channel limit: it won’t handle several microphones or a more elaborate guest setup. It also offers less device flexibility than the MAONO P1, which is designed to connect with phones and tablets. I’d choose this for a straightforward, computer-based solo stream.

   Pros:

   • Air mode offers a way to add vocal presence at the interface.
   • High-headroom instrument input supports clean guitar and bass recording.
   • 24-bit/192kHz conversion provides headroom for recording beyond a basic stream setup.
   • Includes professional software and a three-year warranty.

   Cons:

   • Two channels limit use with multiple microphones or more involved guest streams.
   • USB connection ties the setup to a compatible computer.
   • Does not provide the hybrid mobile-device connectivity described for the MAONO P1.

   Best for: Solo streamers who use an XLR microphone with guitar or another instrument and want an interface that can also serve for home recording.

   Not ideal for: Streamers who need multiple microphone inputs, frequent phone or tablet connections, or built-in mixer-style controls.

   • Connectivity:USB
   • Channels:2
   • Maximum sample rate:192 kHz
   • Frequency response:20 kHz
   • Compatible sources and devices:Microphone, instrument, computer, headphones, studio monitors
   • Dimensions:1.71 × 5.65 × 3.77 in
   • Weight:12.32 oz
   • Warranty:Three years
   Our verdict

   “Choose the Scarlett Solo 3rd Gen for a computer-based solo stream that may also include guitar or home recording.”

   → See it on Amazon →

2. Wrugste USB Audio Interface Solo 24Bit/192kHz with 48V Phantom Power for Recording, Podcasting, Streaming

   

   Best for Broad Software and OS Compatibility

   View on Amazon

   The Wrugste Solo is aimed at streamers who want a basic microphone-and-instrument interface that can work across a wide range of systems. Its 48V phantom power supports condenser microphones, and the listed compatibility includes Windows, Mac, Linux, and Android, a broader mix than the computer-focused Focusrite Scarlett Solo 3rd Gen. It also names OBS alongside common recording software, so it suits a stream-and-record workflow. One specification needs careful reading: despite the 192kHz figure in the product title and description, the listed maximum sample rate is 96 kHz. It has two channels and no included recording software, so it is a more basic choice than the Scarlett for buyers who value a bundled creative package. I’d pick it for compatibility, not for extra streaming controls.

   Pros:

   • 48V phantom power supports condenser microphones.
   • Combo XLR and ¼-inch connections accommodate microphones and instruments.
   • Lists compatibility with Windows, Mac, Linux, and Android.
   • Names OBS and several common recording applications as supported software.

   Cons:

   • The listed maximum sample rate is 96 kHz, despite the 192kHz title and description claim.
   • No recording software is included.
   • Driver installation may be needed on some systems.

   Best for: Streamers using a condenser microphone who need a simple two-channel interface with listed support for Windows, Mac, Linux, or Android.

   Not ideal for: Creators who want bundled recording software, more than two channels, or a clearly specified 192kHz maximum sample rate.

   • Connectivity:USB audio input; XLR connectivity listed
   • Channels:2
   • Maximum sample rate:96 kHz
   • Bit depth:24-bit
   • Phantom power:48V
   • Compatible operating systems:Windows, Mac OS X, Linux, Android
   • Supported software:Cubase, Logic Pro, Reaper, Reason, Ableton Live, FL Studio, Studio One, Audition, OBS
   • Warranty:Two years
   Our verdict

   “Choose the Wrugste if broad listed OS compatibility matters more than bundled software or a higher confirmed sample rate.”

   → See it on Amazon →

3. MAONO P1 USB Audio Interface with 70dB Gain for PC, Phone, iPad & Guitar

   

   Best for Mobile and Cross-Device Streaming

   View on Amazon

   The MAONO P1 stands out for streamers who want to move between a computer and mobile devices rather than keep every session tied to a desktop. Its listed compatibility includes smartphones, tablets, Android, and iOS, giving it a broader device brief than the Scarlett Solo 3rd Gen. The product description also calls out auto-gain, real-time monitoring, and loopback, useful capabilities when balancing a microphone with audio from a device. That flexibility comes with a setup tradeoff: software routing may take extra configuration, and the supplied information says it has no XLR microphone input, a significant limitation for streamers with a conventional XLR mic. Although the listed maximum sample rate is 192kHz, the channel count remains two, so it is better for solo creators than multi-mic shows.

   Pros:

   • Hybrid USB connectivity is intended for use with computers and mobile devices.
   • Auto-gain and real-time monitoring can simplify microphone level management.
   • Loopback and software routing support mixed audio for content creation.
   • Listed maximum sample rate is 192 kHz.

   Cons:

   • Product information says there is no XLR microphone input.
   • Software routing may require setup time.
   • Two channels limit multi-microphone streaming.

   Best for: Mobile-first solo streamers and podcasters who want to connect a phone, tablet, or computer and use routing or loopback features.

   Not ideal for: Streamers whose main microphone uses XLR, or anyone planning a multi-microphone show or seeking a simple setup without routing configuration.

   • Connectivity:USB
   • Channels:2
   • Maximum sample rate:192 kHz
   • Frequency response:20 kHz
   • Listed compatible devices:Guitar, laptop, microphone, smartphone, tablet
   • Listed operating systems:Android, ChromeOS, Windows, iOS
   • Dimensions:5.9 × 5.98 × 3.46 in
   • Listed features:Auto-gain, real-time monitoring, software routing, loopback
   Our verdict

   “Pick the MAONO P1 for mobile-friendly solo streaming and loopback, but skip it if your setup depends on an XLR mic.”

   → See it on Amazon →

4. M-AUDIO M-Track Duo USB Audio Interface

   

   Best for Two-Mic Starter Setups

   View on Amazon

   The M-Track Duo makes sense when a stream needs two physical microphone or instrument connections without moving up to a larger production console. Its two combo inputs with phantom power offer more room for a co-host or a microphone-and-instrument arrangement than the single-mic focus of the M-Audio M-Track Solo. USB power and zero-latency direct monitoring also keep a basic computer setup simple: you can hear the input without waiting for software playback. The main compromise is its 48kHz resolution, below the listed maximums of the Scarlett Solo 3rd Gen and Wrugste interface. That limitation matters more to creators recording music at higher resolutions than to many streaming workflows. It is a practical entry-level pick, though it lacks the mobile-oriented routing described for the MAONO P1.

   Pros:

   • Two combo XLR/Line/Instrument inputs accommodate different sources.
   • Phantom power supports condenser microphones.
   • Zero-latency direct monitoring helps avoid distracting monitoring delay.
   • USB-powered design and included MPC Beats software support a simple starter setup.

   Cons:

   • Maximum audio resolution is 48 kHz, below several other interfaces in this roundup.
   • The supplied product information specifies limited operating-system versions.
   • Software bundle access may require registration.

   Best for: New streamers who need two mic-capable inputs for a co-host or a microphone-and-instrument setup and want direct monitoring.

   Not ideal for: Creators who need higher sample-rate recording, advanced routing, or a compact single-input interface for a one-mic setup.

   • Audio resolution:48 kHz
   • Inputs:Two combo XLR/Line/Instrument inputs with phantom power
   • Outputs:Stereo ¼-inch main outputs; ¼-inch headphone output
   • Power:USB powered
   • Monitoring:Zero-latency direct monitoring
   • Supported operating systems:Windows 7–10, Mac OS High Sierra–Big Sur, iOS
   • Included software:MPC Beats, Pro Tools First | M-Audio Edition
   Our verdict

   “Choose the M-Track Duo if you need two mic-capable inputs and straightforward monitoring more than high-resolution recording.”

   → See it on Amazon →

5. M-AUDIO M-Track Solo USB Audio Interface

   

   Best Compact Starter Interface

   View on Amazon

   The M-Track Solo is a straightforward choice for a streamer who needs one microphone input, simple monitoring, and a small USB-powered unit. Its single combo XLR/Line input with phantom power handles a microphone, while a separate Line/Instrument input leaves room for a guitar or other source. The USB/Direct switch lets you blend input monitoring with computer playback, a useful way to hear yourself without relying solely on software monitoring. Compared with the M-Track Duo, the Solo gives up a second combo input, so it is less suited to co-hosts using separate microphones. Its 48kHz maximum also trails the Scarlett Solo 3rd Gen’s 192kHz specification, making it a basic streaming and recording tool rather than the better choice for higher-resolution music projects. MPC Beats is included, but registration is needed for the software package.

   Pros:

   • Combo XLR input with phantom power supports condenser microphones.
   • Separate Line/Instrument input allows a microphone and an instrument source.
   • USB/Direct switch supports zero-latency input monitoring.
   • Compact USB-powered design includes MPC Beats software.

   Cons:

   • Only one combo XLR input, unlike the two-input M-Track Duo.
   • Maximum sample rate is 48 kHz.
   • The ⅛-inch headphone output may require an adapter for some headphones.

   Best for: Solo streamers on Mac or PC who want a compact, USB-powered interface for one XLR microphone and occasional instrument input.

   Not ideal for: Co-hosted shows needing two XLR microphones, creators seeking higher sample-rate recording, or users who need an included ¼-inch headphone jack.

   • Connectivity:USB Type-B
   • Channels:2
   • Inputs:Balanced XLR mic, balanced ¼-inch line, unbalanced ¼-inch instrument
   • Outputs:RCA outputs; ⅛-inch headphone output
   • Maximum sample rate:48 kHz
   • Phantom power:Supported
   • Power:USB powered
   • Dimensions:4.46 × 6.43 × 2.14 in
   • Weight:10.6 oz
   Our verdict

   “Choose the M-Track Solo for a simple, portable one-mic stream; choose the M-Track Duo if you need two combo inputs.”

   → See it on Amazon →

6. RØDE RØDECaster Duo Compact Audio Production Studio, Black

   

   Best All-in-One Streaming Studio

   View on Amazon

   The RØDECaster Duo suits streamers who want more than a basic mic interface: its touchscreen, programmable SMART pads, effects, and multiple connection options put audio control in one compact unit. Its dual Revolution Preamps support a polished mic setup, while USB, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, and Ethernet give it more routing flexibility than the two-channel MAONO PS22 Lite. That extra control makes it a stronger fit for shows with sound cues or several audio sources, rather than a simple solo stream. The tradeoff is complexity: buyers seeking a straightforward way to connect one microphone may find the Duo’s production features unnecessary, and the supplied information leaves software-update and warranty details unclear. I’d choose it for an expandable creator setup, not for the simplest plug-and-play desk.

   Pros:

   • Dual Revolution Preamps support clear microphone capture.
   • Touchscreen and programmable SMART pads provide hands-on control of stream audio.
   • USB, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, and Ethernet support varied connection setups.
   • Compact format combines interface and production controls.

   Cons:

   • Its production features may be excessive for a simple one-mic stream.
   • Software-update and warranty information is not detailed in the supplied product data.
   • Some features may require extra accessories or setup.

   Best for: Streamers and podcasters who want touchscreen control, sound pads, effects, and flexible connections in one production console.

   Not ideal for: Solo streamers seeking a basic, low-complexity microphone interface or buyers who need clear information about software updates and warranty support.

   • Channels:4
   • Connectivity:USB
   • Output connectors:TRS, USB Type-C
   • Audio input:USB
   • Frequency:2.4 GHz
   • Noise level:76 dB
   • Dimensions:9.25 × 8.86 × 2.99 in
   • Weight:2 kg
   Our verdict

   “Choose the RØDECaster Duo if you want a compact, feature-rich streaming control center rather than a basic two-channel interface.”

   → See it on Amazon →

7. PIYONE 2X2 24-bit/192kHz USB C Audio Interface for High-Fidelity Recording, XLR/TRS Combo Inputs, Monitor Loopback, Alloy Red

   

   Best for Simple Two-Input Streaming

   View on Amazon

   The PIYONE 2X2 is a fit for streamers who need a conventional interface for a microphone and an instrument, without the sound effects and control surface of the FIFINE Ampligame SC3. Its XLR/TRS combo inputs accommodate different sources, and zero-latency direct monitoring lets you hear input audio without relying on a software monitoring path. The listed 24-bit/192kHz capability offers headroom for recording and production, though a stream’s final quality also depends on the software and platform settings. This is a focused two-channel choice, not a mixer for managing several live sources or changing effects on the fly. Compared with the more control-heavy RØDECaster Duo, it keeps the setup simpler, but provides fewer production tools and has limited detail about bundled software.

   Pros:

   • Two XLR/TRS combo inputs handle microphone and instrument sources.
   • Zero-latency direct monitoring supports immediate input checks.
   • Listed 24-bit/192kHz recording capability suits high-resolution capture workflows.
   • Two-year limited warranty is specified.

   Cons:

   • Two channels limit multi-microphone and more involved streaming setups.
   • Bundled software and extra production features are not specified.
   • USB-C may require an adapter with older devices.

   Best for: Solo streamers or musicians who need two inputs for an XLR microphone and instrument, plus direct monitoring.

   Not ideal for: Creators routing multiple microphones or live audio sources who want built-in effects, sound pads, or a dedicated mixer-style control surface.

   • Channels:2
   • Audio input:XLR/TRS combo
   • Maximum sample rate:192 kHz
   • Recording resolution:24-bit
   • Connectivity:USB
   • Compatible devices:Guitar, PC, Mac, iOS
   • Warranty:2-year limited
   • Weight:0.74 kg
   Our verdict

   “Pick the PIYONE 2X2 for a straightforward two-input stream or recording setup where direct monitoring matters more than built-in production controls.”

   → See it on Amazon →

8. FIFINE Ampligame SC3 Gaming Audio Mixer with Indi-Fader and Volume Control

   

   Best for Gaming Stream Controls

   View on Amazon

   The FIFINE Ampligame SC3 favors live gaming control over recording-focused flexibility. Independent channel controls, built-in sound effects, and voice-changing modes give streamers quick ways to shape a broadcast, while the XLR input with 48V power supports a compatible condenser microphone. That makes it more immediately geared toward gaming streams than the PIYONE 2X2, which focuses on two-input capture and direct monitoring rather than effects. The SC3 also lists four channels, but it has only one XLR mic input, so that figure should not be mistaken for support for multiple XLR microphones. Its 3.5mm outputs and compact footprint suit a desk setup, though buyers should account for the missing XLR cable and possible software configuration.

   Pros:

   • XLR microphone input supports 48V phantom power.
   • Independent controls help adjust separate audio channels during a stream.
   • Built-in sound effects and voice-changing modes add live customization.
   • Compact body includes 3.5mm line and headphone outputs.

   Cons:

   • Only one XLR microphone input limits multi-mic use.
   • XLR cable is not included.
   • Some features may require software configuration.

   Best for: Gaming streamers who want individual channel controls, voice effects, and RGB lighting alongside one XLR microphone.

   Not ideal for: Co-hosted shows needing multiple XLR microphones or creators seeking a high-resolution recording interface with more detailed production specifications.

   • Channels:4
   • Microphone input:XLR
   • Phantom power:48 V
   • Connectivity:USB, XLR mic input
   • Power source:USB-C
   • Output connectors:3.5mm line out, 3.5mm headphone jack
   • Dimensions:4.44 × 6.45 × 1.6 in
   • Weight:0.5 kg
   Our verdict

   “Choose the SC3 if gaming-oriented controls and live effects matter more to you than multiple microphone inputs or recording-focused detail.”

   → See it on Amazon →

9. MAONO G1 Neo Gaming Audio Mixer Audio Interface with XLR Input & 48V

   

   Best for Phone-and-PC Streaming

   View on Amazon

   The MAONO G1 Neo stands out for streamers who want to bring a phone into a computer-based broadcast: its listed Bluetooth, auxiliary, and USB connections accommodate several source types, alongside an XLR microphone with phantom power. Loopback and one-click mute address useful live-stream tasks, while customizable RGB adds a gaming-focused touch. Compared with the FIFINE Ampligame SC3, the G1 Neo emphasizes device connections and phone integration rather than a stated set of voice-changing modes. It still has four listed channels, but the supplied details do not spell out every routing function, and USB microphones and Xbox are listed as unsupported. The external power-adapter requirement for stable long sessions also makes it less convenient than a simple bus-powered interface.

   Pros:

   • XLR microphone support includes 48V phantom power.
   • Bluetooth, auxiliary, and USB connections support multiple audio sources.
   • One-click mute and loopback are useful for live-stream control.
   • Compact design includes customizable RGB lighting.

   Cons:

   • Not compatible with USB microphones or Xbox, according to the supplied product data.
   • An external power adapter is recommended for stable long-term use.
   • Software-update support is not detailed.

   Best for: PC streamers who want to mix an XLR microphone with phone or Bluetooth audio and use loopback for live content.

   Not ideal for: Xbox users, USB-microphone owners, or streamers who need a self-contained setup without a separate power adapter.

   • Channels:4
   • Connectivity:Auxiliary, Bluetooth, USB
   • Audio input:Microphone, Bluetooth, computer, smartphone
   • Output connectors:3.5mm, USB-C
   • Power source:Corded electric
   • Voltage:5 V
   • Dimensions:6.29 × 2 × 5.19 in
   • Weight:1.2 lb
   Our verdict

   “The G1 Neo makes sense for PC streamers mixing XLR and phone audio, provided its device limits and external power needs fit your setup.”

   → See it on Amazon →

10. MAONO PS22 Lite USB Audio Interface for PC, Guitar & Vocals Streaming

    

    Best for Portable Recording and Streaming

    View on Amazon

    The MAONO PS22 Lite is the more recording-oriented pick for creators who stream vocals or instruments and want a compact two-channel interface. It supports microphone and instrument inputs, phantom power, and listed 24-bit/192kHz recording, with compatibility spanning desktop systems and mobile platforms. That makes it more flexible for a musician-streamer than the gaming-first FIFINE Ampligame SC3, which adds live effects and gaming controls but has one XLR input. The PS22 Lite keeps the signal path simpler; it does not list built-in effects or advanced processing, so changes need to happen in software. Its two channels also limit growth if you later want several microphones or separately controlled sources. Driver setup may take extra effort on some systems.

    Pros:

    • Microphone and instrument inputs support vocal and music streams.
    • Phantom power supports compatible microphones.
    • Listed 24-bit/192kHz recording capability suits high-resolution capture.
    • Broad operating-system and software compatibility supports varied creator workflows.

    Cons:

    • Two channels limit multi-microphone and complex routing setups.
    • No built-in effects or advanced processing are listed.
    • Some systems may require driver setup for best performance.

    Best for: Mobile or home creators who stream vocals, guitar, or bass and want a compact interface that also supports common recording software.

    Not ideal for: Gaming streamers who want onboard voice effects and channel controls, or hosts planning to connect several microphones at once.

    • Channels:2
    • Connectivity:USB
    • Maximum sample rate:192 kHz
    • Frequency response:20 kHz
    • Compatible operating systems:Android, ChromeOS, Windows, iOS, macOS
    • Audio inputs:Microphone, guitar, bass, computer, smartphone
    • Dimensions:6.29 × 5.19 × 2 in
    • Weight:0.43 kg
    Our verdict

    “Choose the PS22 Lite if portability and microphone-or-instrument recording matter more than onboard streaming effects or extra inputs.”

    → See it on Amazon →

11. MAONO P2 Hybrid USB Audio Interface Dual XLR for PC, Phone, iPad, Guitar

    

    Best for Multi-Device Streaming

    View on Amazon

    The MAONO P2 suits streamers who need to route audio between a computer and mobile devices without rebuilding their setup. Its dual XLR inputs can accommodate two microphones, while support for phones, iPads, guitars, and computers gives it more workflow flexibility than the Focusrite Scarlett Solo 4th Gen, which is a simpler one-input choice. Direct monitoring with separate headphone and monitor controls can help keep listening levels manageable while recording. The tradeoff is that the P2 has only two channels, so it is not a fit for larger multi-mic shows, and its routing and effects may take more setup than a beginner wants. It makes most sense when connecting several device types matters more than keeping controls simple.

    Pros:

    • Supports simultaneous connections to computers, phones, and iPads for flexible streaming workflows.
    • Two XLR inputs allow two microphones to be connected.
    • Direct monitoring includes separate headphone and monitor controls.
    • Supports sample rates up to 192 kHz and offers routing and VST effects.

    Cons:

    • Two channels limit its usefulness for larger panel streams or multi-microphone recordings.
    • Routing and effects can make setup harder for first-time interface users.
    • Full use of its processing features depends on compatible software.

    Best for: Streamers and podcasters who switch between a computer and phone or tablet and need two XLR microphone inputs.

    Not ideal for: Beginners seeking a plug-and-play setup, or teams recording more than two channels at once.

    • Connectivity:USB
    • Channels:2
    • Maximum sample rate:192 kHz
    • Supported devices:Guitar, headphones, laptop, microphone, smartphone
    • Audio inputs:Microphone, guitar, PC, smartphone, iPad
    • Supported operating systems:Android, ChromeOS, Windows, iOS, macOS
    • Dimensions:6.42 × 8.27 × 3.23 in
    • Weight:0.5 kg
    Our verdict

    “Choose the P2 if your streaming setup moves between computer and mobile devices; skip it if you want a simpler interface or need more than two channels.”

    → See it on Amazon →

12. MAONO AME2 Audio Interface Mixer, Podcast Studio Console with XLR Input

    

    Best for Podcast-Style Streams

    View on Amazon

    The MAONO AME2 is the most console-like pick in this group, aimed at streamers who want sound pads, effects, and several connection types close at hand. Its 10-channel mixer layout and Bluetooth, XLR, 3.5 mm, and 6.35 mm inputs offer more live-show flexibility than the focused Elgato Wave XLR MK.2, which centers on a single XLR microphone chain and software processing. That extra control can make guest audio and on-the-fly cues easier to manage, but it also brings a steeper setup learning curve. The AME2 does not support USB microphones, and its stated microphone compatibility is narrower than its broad input list might suggest. I’d favor it for a planned podcast-style stream, not for someone who wants the fewest controls between mic and computer.

    Pros:

    • 10-channel mixer format provides more live audio control than a basic two-channel interface.
    • Offers XLR, 3.5 mm, 6.35 mm, and Bluetooth input options.
    • Customizable sound pads and effects can support live cues and show production.
    • Phantom power support accommodates compatible condenser microphones.

    Cons:

    • Does not support USB microphones.
    • Its controls and setup can take time to learn.
    • Microphone compatibility may be limited despite the range of input connections.

    Best for: Podcast and interview streamers who want sound pads, effects, and multiple wired or Bluetooth audio sources in one console.

    Not ideal for: Streamers using USB microphones or buyers who want a simple, software-led XLR interface.

    • Channels:10
    • Connectivity:XLR, 3.5 mm TRRS, 6.35 mm, USB Type-C
    • Output connector:XLR
    • Audio inputs:Bluetooth, 1/4-inch audio, 3.5 mm audio, XLR
    • Power source:Corded electric
    • Voltage:5 V
    • Dimensions:9.64 × 6.18 × 2.16 in
    • Weight:0.95 kg
    Our verdict

    “Pick the AME2 for a feature-rich podcast desk with live cues and multiple sources, but choose a simpler interface if you use a USB mic or want minimal setup.”

    → See it on Amazon →

13. Elgato Wave XLR MK.2 USB Audio Interface and DSP Mixer

    

    Best for XLR Mic Processing

    View on Amazon

    The Elgato Wave XLR MK.2 is a strong match for a streamer building around one XLR microphone and wanting processing close to the interface. Its 80 dB of gain is useful for microphones that need substantial amplification, while onboard DSP effects and low-latency monitoring support a more direct mic-to-stream workflow than the Focusrite Scarlett Solo 4th Gen, whose strengths lean toward recording and its Air mode. Touch controls with LED feedback make quick level changes visible, but the Wave XLR MK.2 is less flexible for multiple physical sources: it lists XLR audio input and two channels, rather than a broad set of inputs. It also depends on Wave Link and recent operating systems, so streamers seeking cross-platform or software-independent control should look elsewhere.

    Pros:

    • Up to 80 dB of gain supports microphones with high gain requirements.
    • Onboard DSP effects add voice processing to the streaming chain.
    • Low-latency monitoring helps the streamer hear their voice in real time.
    • Touch controls and LED level feedback make adjustments easy to see.

    Cons:

    • XLR-focused input options offer less source flexibility than the MAONO AME2.
    • Wave Link requires Windows 11 or macOS 14.2 and later.
    • DSP features may take time to configure to suit a stream.

    Best for: PC or Mac streamers using one demanding XLR microphone who want strong gain, onboard processing, and visible controls.

    Not ideal for: Buyers needing multiple input types, broader operating-system support, or a setup that does not rely on Wave Link.

    • Connectivity:USB
    • Channels:2
    • Audio input:XLR
    • Maximum sample rate:192 kHz
    • Maximum gain:80 dB
    • Supported software:Elgato Wave Link
    • Operating systems:Windows 11 and later; macOS 14.2 and later
    • Weight:11.36 oz
    Our verdict

    “Choose the Wave XLR MK.2 for a software-supported, single-XLR-mic streaming rig; skip it if you need broader inputs or older operating-system support.”

    → See it on Amazon →

14. Focusrite Scarlett Solo 4th Gen USB-C Audio Interface

    

    Best for Solo Streamers

    View on Amazon

    The Scarlett Solo 4th Gen earns its place as the straightforward choice for a streamer who uses one microphone and wants an interface that also suits voice recording or music. Its compact design, Air mode, and stated 192 kHz maximum sample rate make it a practical desk or travel companion. Against the Scarlett 2i2 4th Gen, the Solo keeps the footprint smaller but gives up the flexibility of two mic preamps; that difference matters if a co-host may join later. Compared with the more streaming-specific Elgato Wave XLR MK.2, it offers a less specialized processing setup, but supports all audio recording software rather than relying on Wave Link. Its one audio input limits expansion, and USB connection means it is not a standalone mobile mixer.

    Pros:

    • Compact size suits limited desk space and portable recording setups.
    • Air mode can add character to vocal and guitar recordings.
    • Supports a maximum sample rate of 192 kHz.
    • Compatible with all audio recording software.

    Cons:

    • One listed audio input limits microphone and instrument combinations.
    • A USB connection is required, so it is not a standalone mobile streaming console.
    • The included software bundle may take time to sort through.

    Best for: Solo streamers, musicians, and voice creators who need one microphone input in a compact interface that works with common recording software.

    Not ideal for: Co-hosted shows or streamers who expect to add a second microphone and want dedicated streaming DSP controls.

    • Connectivity:USB
    • Channels:2
    • Audio inputs:1
    • Maximum sample rate:192 kHz
    • Frequency response:20 kHz
    • Supported operating systems:Mac OS, Windows OS, iOS
    • Dimensions:3.78 × 5.63 × 1.83 in
    • Weight:14.4 oz
    • Warranty:3 years
    Our verdict

    “Choose the Scarlett Solo for a compact one-mic stream and recording setup; move up to the Scarlett 2i2 if you need two microphone preamps.”

    → See it on Amazon →

15. Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 4th Gen USB-C Audio Interface

    

    Best for Two-Mic Streaming

    View on Amazon

    For a stream that may include a co-host or a microphone and instrument, the Scarlett 2i2 4th Gen offers the most balanced expansion path among these Focusrite picks. Its two mic preamps let two XLR microphones connect at once, unlike the Scarlett Solo 4th Gen, which keeps the setup smaller but is listed with one audio input. Auto Gain and Clip Safe help reduce level-setting mishaps during a live session, while Air mode gives voices and instruments another tonal option. The tradeoff is a larger, heavier unit than the Solo and a USB-C connection that may call for adapters with older devices. It is still a focused two-channel interface, not a mixer like the MAONO AME2, so sound pads and multiple live sources are outside its role.

    Pros:

    • Two mic preamps support co-host streams and two-microphone setups.
    • Auto Gain and Clip Safe simplify level setting and help manage clipping.
    • Air mode offers an additional tonal option for vocals and instruments.
    • Compatible with all audio recording software and supports up to 192 kHz.

    Cons:

    • Two channels still limit larger panel or multi-source productions.
    • USB-C may require adapters for older devices.
    • Its larger size and weight make it less convenient than the Scarlett Solo for compact setups.

    Best for: Streamers recording two XLR microphones, or one microphone plus an instrument, who want straightforward level-setting tools.

    Not ideal for: Solo creators prioritizing the smallest footprint, or podcast hosts needing sound pads and mixer-style control for multiple sources.

    • Connectivity:USB
    • Channels:2
    • Maximum sample rate:192 kHz
    • Frequency response:20 kHz
    • Impedance:50 ohm
    • Supported devices:Microphone, instrument, personal computer, tablet, headphones, smartphone, studio monitors
    • Supported operating systems:Mac OS, Windows OS, iOS
    • Dimensions:4.61 × 7.09 × 1.87 in
    • Weight:1.7 lb
    Our verdict

    “Choose the Scarlett 2i2 if two microphones and dependable level-setting tools matter more than a compact footprint or mixer-style effects.”

    → See it on Amazon →

How We Picked

I ranked these 15 options by how well they address real streaming tasks: connecting a microphone, monitoring audio, adding a second source, and controlling sound without distracting from the live session. I also weighed input flexibility, device compatibility, physical controls, and setup demands. A higher sample-rate specification alone did not move a product up the list; routing and easy operation matter more when a stream is live.

The ranking separates straightforward USB interfaces from gaming mixers and podcast production consoles, since they solve different problems. Models with a useful balance of sound-input flexibility and manageable operation rank ahead of devices that are more specialized, while compact and lower-complexity picks remain relevant for one-mic creators. I also factored in tradeoffs: a device with more controls can require more setup, and a basic interface may not support the source count or live adjustments some streamers want.

Factors to Consider When Choosing Audio Interface For Streaming

Choosing an audio interface for streaming starts with your signal path, not a feature checklist. Think through what you need to connect now, what might join your setup later, and which adjustments you want to make while live. These factors help distinguish a straightforward USB interface from a mixer-style streaming device.

Count Inputs by Real Sources, Not by Future Possibilities

List every sound source you expect to connect at the same time: your microphone, a co-host, an instrument, or another analog source. A one-input interface can keep a solo setup simple, but adding a guest may mean swapping cables or changing the system later. A two-input model offers room to grow, though it does not automatically provide independent control over every sound coming from your computer. Avoid buying for a hypothetical multi-person show if you have no plan to run one. If you expect guests, check how the device handles separate mic signals and headphone monitoring before deciding.

Separate Microphone Gain Needs From Phantom Power

Microphones do not all need the same connection or amplification. A dynamic mic may call for more clean gain than a condenser, while many condenser mics need 48V phantom power from the interface. Check the microphone’s connection type and power requirements rather than assuming every XLR input is equivalent. High gain figures can be appealing, but they do not by themselves tell you how quiet or suitable the complete signal path will be. Match the interface to the mic you own, and leave room for a different mic only if you expect to change your setup.

Decide How Much Live Control You Need

A conventional interface often keeps the front panel focused on input and monitoring, while a gaming mixer or production console can put more adjustments within reach. Physical controls can help when you need to react quickly during a stream, but extra buttons and routing choices can take time to configure. Software controls may be sufficient if your stream is simple and you are comfortable adjusting sound on a computer. Think about what you will change while speaking, rather than choosing a device based on the number of controls alone. More hardware control is useful only when it fits your workflow.

Check Computer, Phone, and Tablet Compatibility

USB connectivity does not guarantee that every device will work in the way you expect. Confirm the interface’s compatibility with your operating system, streaming software, and any phone or tablet you plan to use. Mobile streaming can involve power, adapters, and app-specific audio handling, so a setup that works on a desktop may not transfer directly. If you stream from more than one device, treat that flexibility as a primary requirement rather than an occasional bonus. For a computer-only workflow, avoid paying for mobile-oriented features you will not use.

Plan Monitoring and Routing Before You Go Live

Good monitoring lets you hear your own mic and other sources without relying entirely on the delayed sound from a stream. Check whether you can connect headphones and whether the device offers the monitoring and routing options your software setup needs. Loopback can help capture computer audio alongside a mic, but it is not interchangeable with having extra physical inputs. A common mistake is to buy for microphone quality alone and discover later that game audio, calls, or music are awkward to route. Draw a simple signal map before choosing: identify what enters the interface and where each sound needs to go.

Choose Simplicity or Expandability Deliberately

A compact interface can reduce desk clutter and make first-time setup easier, while a larger mixer-style device can combine more controls and sources in one place. Extra flexibility can bring a learning curve, more routing decisions, and a greater chance of needing to adjust settings before a broadcast. Conversely, choosing the simplest model can become limiting if your show regularly adds a co-host or another audio source. Pay more when a specific capability will change how you produce the stream, not just because a device has a longer feature list. The best fit is the one you can operate reliably during a live session.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do I need a two-input interface if I stream alone?

Not always. A one-input model can be a sensible fit if you use one XLR microphone and do not expect to connect another analog source at the same time. A second input becomes useful for a guest, instrument, or a setup that may expand later. Remember that two inputs do not automatically provide every mixing or routing feature a multi-person show needs. If you are unsure, decide whether a second source is part of your actual streaming plan rather than buying solely for a possible future change.

Can a gaming audio mixer replace a traditional audio interface?

It can serve as the main audio device in some streaming setups, but the better choice depends on what you want to control. Gaming mixers in this roundup emphasize hands-on adjustments and streaming-focused operation, while traditional interfaces are generally a more direct fit for connecting and monitoring recording sources. Check input types, computer-audio routing, headphone monitoring, and software compatibility before treating them as interchangeable. If your priority is a simple mic connection, the mixer controls may add complexity you do not need. If you want adjustments at the desk while live, those controls may be worth the extra setup.

Will an audio interface improve a USB microphone?

Most USB microphones connect directly to a computer and do not need a separate interface for their mic signal. An interface is typically relevant when you want to connect an XLR microphone or other compatible analog source. Replacing a USB mic with an XLR setup can add flexibility, but it also means managing a separate microphone, cable, and interface. Check how your current mic connects before shopping, since an interface may not provide a useful upgrade on its own. If you plan to keep using a USB mic, focus instead on monitoring and software options that fit that connection.

Does 192kHz audio matter for a livestream?

For most live streams, a higher maximum sample rate is less important than dependable setup, clean mic gain, and workable routing. Your streaming software and platform also affect the audio format that reaches viewers, so the interface’s highest supported rate may not become the delivered stream quality. Choose based on the microphone, input count, and monitoring features you will use every session. A high specification can still matter for other recording work, but it should not outweigh practical streaming needs. Avoid paying more or accepting a harder workflow just to chase a number that does not solve your current problem.

Should I choose an interface with loopback for streaming?

Loopback can be useful when you want to send computer audio, such as game sound or a call, into your streaming software alongside a microphone. It may simplify routing, but whether you need it depends on how your computer and broadcast software already handle those sources. Loopback also does not replace physical mic inputs or guarantee easy control over every sound. Map your intended sources first, then check whether your existing software can combine them cleanly. Choose an interface with loopback when it solves a specific routing problem in your setup, not just because streaming is part of the product description.

Conclusion

For most creators, I recommend the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 4th Gen as best overall for its practical two-input setup. The MAONO PS22 Lite is my best value direction for shoppers who want a streaming-focused USB interface without stepping up to a larger production console; compare its compatibility and controls with your exact setup before choosing. Beginners who want a direct one-mic path should look at the Scarlett Solo 4th Gen. For a best premium, hands-on production pick, the RØDECaster Duo suits streamers who will use its broader controls and routing. If phone or tablet use is central, consider the MAONO P1 or P2 Hybrid; for gaming-focused desk controls, compare the FIFINE Ampligame SC3 and MAONO G1 Neo. Choose by the sources you need to connect and manage live—not by the longest feature list.